Munich 1972 Olympic Games Attack Was Another Hoax

In following text about the Munich 1972 Olympic games incident, we will look at the silly attempts at creating an official narrative, and you will be able to see for yourself once again how badly it was done. All this while having a really good chuckle, with sources available for your own research.

One of the most reproduced photos taken during the siege captured a kidnapper on the balcony attached to Munich Olympic village Building 31, where members of the Israeli Olympic team and delegation were quartered; Source: Wikipedia, author: Kurt Strumpf AP

Several photographers took pictures of the masked man. And yet no English-language caption that has accompanied these photos over the past 45 years has identified him, either by name or alias. That is a mystifying oversight given that there were only eight terrorists in Munich, all of whose names are well-known. Faceless and nameless, his anonymity has become his identity.

I do not remember when was the first time I thought about looking into the Munich 1972 incident, but there were a few links to it that I noticed while deconstructing the infamous Lockerbie airplane crash. Besides the Lockerbie and Munich events, there seem to be a few more interconnected incidents, which got my attention and fit a pattern pointing to the same group of stooges, however you will have to wait a bit more for additional disclosures to be published here.

When thinking about the world as it was in the 1970’s, all such events involving »terrorists« are an indication the PTB were planning in advance: the fake Cold War would be ending in the near future, and another fantom enemy (terrorists) was needed to replace the existing one (invented and defeated communists), a notion that has undeniably become our everyday omnipresent reality. When fabricating a »terrorist threat« that will soon overwhelm the world, all »terrorist« events are adding weight to an agenda of the PTB, and it cannot be overlooked that at least Lockerbie and Munich 1972 incidents look fabricated and do not stand up to the scrutiny of research and a skeptical gaze. Maybe at the time they did not expect such photographic material or any of official mainstreamed resources to be so easily accessible in 21^st century, as the whole cover-up was too sloppy to deceive anybody using modern equipment to analyze the available evidence left behind. Furthermore, we have progressed quite a bit since 1970’s in our ability to see through the veil of lies; in my personal opinion, the producers of the past fake events were not exactly talented and / or meticulous individuals, as there are so many ridiculous errors done while manipulating the content of these events.

When looking at the direct aftermath of this Munich 1972 Olympic incident, we see that it precipitated at least two radical changes in German state functioning and initial conceptualization of international terrorism threat: firstly, Grenzschutzgruppe 9 or GSG9 (in english, Border Protection Group 9) was established since the Bavarian policemen were allegedly unable to cope with the [Olympic terror] events, which became apparent during the live broadcasts of the media around the world[1]. The use of the Bundeswehr (German Army) forces, which, in contrast to the police, had specially trained snipers, was not possible under existing law. Therefore, as the second implication, German law was accordingly changed, allowing Bundeswehr to conduct activities in their backyard. Additionally, the events in Munich and Fürstenfeldbruck had further consequences for the domestic policy of Germany. One of them was the largest wave of forced emigration of Arabs in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany[2]. This expulsion, mainly of Palestinians, led to increasing protests at home and abroad. Potential Palestinian terrorists could be expelled without major investigations. The Arab mediators, who had helped in the attempt to free the hostages in Munich and Fürstenfeldbruck, were also ejected after a few weeks. Many Palestinian organizations were forbidden after the incident, including students’ and workers’ associations, which showed that both highly educated Palestinians and »ordinary« Palestinians were definitely affected. On top of that, looking at the international consequences of Munich 1972 incident, we can learn that Israel (ab)used the incident to launch at least two operations – »Spring of Youth« and »Wrath of God«, both representing massive attacks on Palestinians.

The context of the Munich Olympics can only be explained by what happened in Berlin and Garmisch-Partenkirchen (site of the Winter Olympic games) 36 years prior. From the swastika flags that flew on every street corner to the banning of Jewish athletes from competition to the hiring of Leni Riefenstahl to direct the documentary film Olympia, Adolf Hitler sought to turn the 1936 Olympics into a propaganda showcase for Nazism and the Aryan race. “Hitler’s games” marked the moment when the Olympic Movement was irreversibly co-opted by politics.

Like Rome (1960) and Tokyo (1964), Munich 1972 organizers viewed the Olympics as an opportunity to burnish a new progressive image for their country. A dozen miles from the site of the Dachau concentration camp, organizers stressed unity and peace: they created the first official Olympic mascot (a cute dachshund named Waldi) and hired prominent decadent artists like David Hockney and Jacob Lawrence to design festive posters. The motto was »Die Heiteren Spiele« or »The Happy Games«. »The Olympics of Serenity have become the one thing the Germans didn’t want it to be«, intoned ABC host Jim McKay, »the Olympics of terror«.

Official mainstreamed story explains that in early morning of September 5th 1972, at the Summer Olympics in Munich, 11 Israeli olympic team members team were taken as hostages and killed by a Palestinian terrorist group called the Black September.[3] Why? Their demand was to have prisoners of »Black September« released – 234 prisoners jailed in Israel – as well as the founders of the »Red Army Fraction« (RAF) – Andreas Baader and Ulrike Meinhof[4] – held in Germany and Japanese »terrorist« Kōzō Okamoto. For that, they held 9 Israeli athletes and coaches hostage, as they had killed 2 Israeli athletes already at the beginning of the hostage situation. That is the official story, which resulted in 11 Israelis, 5 terrorists and 1 police officer allegedly dead in Germany (the location is a sensitive detail), while the narrative seems World War II story revisited on a smaller scale. [5]

Was the 1972 Munich Olympics attack, which we are told was an attack by Palestinian militant group Black September aimed at Israel athletes, actually a hoax? Was it merely another plot by the PTB to gain sympathy for Israeli machinations? Was it all, then, merely a publicity stunt to win favor for the Israeli entity as opposed to the Palestinian resistance? As well, who was behind this attack? Was it really the Palestinians or was it another element, whose purpose was to set them up for the fall? It would be exceedingly inane for any Palestinian resistance group to do this – murdering Israeli athletes would serve no purpose and would rather be exceptionally detrimental to their cause.

There is already more than enough to start with while thinking about all this, so let’s look at the Black September organization (BSO) first. Wikipedia explains that:

»the group’s name is derived from the Black September conflict which began on 16 September 1970, when King Hussein of Jordan declared military rule in response to fedayeen attempting to seize his kingdom  — resulting in the deaths and expulsion of thousands of Palestinians fighters from Jordan. The BSO began as a small cell of Fatah men determined to take revenge upon King Hussein and the Jordanian army. «[6]

First of all, this name reminded me of another black-labeled organization of stooges that I have taken apart, Black Hand, a strange company of actors involved in Archduke Franz Ferdinand’s fake assassination in Sarajevo back in 1914, which was an official prelude to World War I. To remind you quickly, this alleged assassination was then used by Austria (ruled by the Habsburgs) to wage a war on Serbia, which then led to a major World war.

When looking at the case of Black September we need to look at the Fatah first as most of the Black September’s members were coming from there. We can learn at Wikipedia that[7]:

“Initially, most of its members were dissidents within Fatah who had been close to Abu Ali Iyad, the commander of Fatah forces in northern Jordan who continued to fight the Jordanian Army after the PLO leadership withdrew.”

And then shortly after that comes another passage:

“There is disagreement among historians, journalists, and primary sources about the nature of the BSO and the extent to which it was controlled by Fatah, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) faction controlled at the time by Yasser Arafat.”[8]

What it implies is that BSO was allegedly an independent organization responsible to nobody in particular. Who was it led by? Let’s try to see who was in charge and what can be found about him/them.

Searching the web, I have repeatedly found that the BSO was influenced and led by two very suspicious characters, namely Abu Nidal and Luttif Affif. The former was said to be the mastermind and the quintessential mercenary, the latter was a leader of the group attacking/acting at Munich Olympic village.

Abu Nidal ; Abu = ‘father’ in Arabic, Nidal = ‘struggle’, ‘strife’, ‘contention’ = Father of struggle ?

Unlike most leaders of the Palestine revolution, rural or lower middle-class in origin, Sabri al-Banna – such was Nidal’s real name – was born to wealth, ease and respectability. Palestine was famous for its oranges, and Sabri’s father, Khalil al-Banna, owned a large plantation on the coastal plain south of Jaffa.

Many researchers have already looked into the persona of Abu Nidal and many of them have provided serious indications, that Abu Nidal was a Mossad agent.[9] After many days of digging and reading to find out more about Nidal, I was happy to see my hunch confirmed by Patrick Seale, who wrote a book about him.

In this book, Seale pointed out that Abu Nidal’s alleged senseless and extremely brutal attacks only benefited Israel. Nidal had two thrusts – he killed Palestinians that were a threat to Israel and hijacked American and European jets. Just weird for a Palestinian freedom fighter, isn’t it?

Seale’s hypothesis is based on four main points:

• Abu Nidal’s alleged killings damaged the Palestinian cause to Israel’s advantage,
• only 10% of the victims were Jewish, the other 90% were bystanders,
• lack of attacks on Israel,
• lack of involvement in the Intifada and Israel’s failure to retaliate against Abu Nidal’s groups.

What is curious is that Israel has never punished Abu Nidal’s organizations, Black September or later ANO (Abu Nidal’s Organization)[10]. Israel has a long-standing policy of launching immediate and massive retaliation against any terrorist attack. While Israeli forces have bombed, shelled and raided Palestinian and Shi’ite positions in Lebanon and have sent hit teams to kill Palestinian guerrilla leaders in other countries[11], they have never attacked Abu Nidal. Given Israel’s harsh and unrelenting policy of retribution against terrorist attacks, this seems more than a bit bizarre.

Yet, was Abu Nidal the ultimate ringleader of the Olympics operation? He was clearly associated, if not directly, then behind the scenes. The typical commentary is that “Abu Nidal is believed to have been involved in plotting the terror attack”. It is his organization so why would he not be involved? The point is – if Abu Nidal was involved, then the Israelis were also involved. That makes it weird for a Palestinian freedom fighter, doesn’t it?

The admitted ringleader of Munich Olympic incident, though, is someone else, a man named Luttif Affif (alternate, Afif), also known as Luttif Issa (Jesus in Arabic). Note the last name, Affif. It is strictly Jewish, in fact, very much so:

Some more research on the name shows that “Afif” means “modest” or “chaste” in Arabic. It is a common Sephardic name (or surname of Jews from Arab countries). Lutif is not a common name, it is probably a bastardization of Lutfi (or Loutfi), which means “kind” or “friendly”. It is also a common first name among Arabic-speaking Jews.[12]

Wikipedia admits it openly, that Issa’s mother was Jewish[13] and what can be found here is Wikipedia “talk” page on the issue, my bolded text:

“Does anyone else have a problem with this biography? To be precise, with the fact that Luttif Afif and his brothers were Jewish? (If you have a Jewish mother, you’re a Jew yourself, full stop. In any case, he was not a Muslim.) This means that a Jewish terrorist led the attack on the Israeli athletes for the purpose of liberating his Jewish brothers from an Israeli jail. I don’t think this makes any sense at all.”

Lower on that same Wikipedia page they talk about a German documentary on the event, and how Afif’s father is interviewed. His father’s name in given as Mohammed Massalha, and the comment says that he calls his son (Luttif) Mohammed as well. On Afif’s Wikipedia page, they also say his father is Mohammed Massalha. But that does not make sense, of course, since his father is Christian. Christian Arabs are not named Mohammed any more than German Christians are named Mohammed. And they especially do not name their kids Mohammed when they are married to Jewish women. It does not make any sense. In the video linked to on that talk page, his father (or the guy playing his father) looks very Jewish.

But the most interesting part of Luttif Afif’s biography at Wikipedia is certainly the following, where his involvement in Munich 1972 alleged attack is described:

“Afif spent most of his time in front of 31 Connollystraße chatting with either the German delegation or the young policewoman Anneliese Graes. According to Graes, Afif spoke fluent German with a French accent. She described him as “always polite and correct.” When he was asked not to wave his hand grenade in front of her, he simply laughed and replied, “You have nothing to fear from me”.[14]

I chuckled reading this as much as when I found a picture of Issa and Anneliese chatting. They look as if they were on a cigarette break outside some coffee shop, their legs calmingly crossed, subtly suggesting with body language they are feeling relaxed. So apparently Issa spent much of the raid flirting with a policewoman. I wonder if he got her number?

Source: Screenshot from Youtube video »One day in September, Part II«, a documentary about Munich 1972, found here

Dan Shilon, a reporter for Israeli Television, when interviewed for the mainstreamed documentary »One day in September« about Munich 1972 alleged attack, said:

»It was a kind of a bizarre, surrealistic situation in which we journalists surrounded the event with every possible camera. Endless cameras around the Olympic village. It was a great story to many television stations and media around the world. I mean, the climax of the Olympic Games, such an event. And perhaps even some of the stations took a very cynical approach to it saying, “Wow! What an audience we’ll get now!”«.[15]

Now, I can imagine this scene, where Issa and Anneliese are having a relaxed chat, to be a part of the script – to give such drama a temporary suspense, where you can, for instance, go use a toilet and not miss any precious frame while doing your thing there. In case you have missed a detail, look at Issa’s face and note that it is not covered with a mask, but painted over with a brown shoe paste.

     

Black September commander »Issa« during the hostage crisis in front of the Israeli apartments in the Munich Olympic Village; screenshots from “One day in September”

Issa and one of his stooges; 5th September 1972

They surely look more like actors on a stage than relentless mercenaries. The man with the gun could double as a rock-star, just imagine a slick Gibson SG (electric guitar) in his hand instead of the gun. Moreover, he surely bears no obvious resemblance to an Arab or a Palestinian. And I really wonder about the fact that a majority of the available Munich 1972 web pictures can only be found in black & white. Were they trying to hide real color of the perpetrators’ skin? With all those cameras and photographers around the Olympic village, I find the absence of high-resolution color images online to be extremely strange.

Issa is talking to Bruno Merk, Bavarian interior minister at the time of event, 5th September 1972

In the picture above you can see that Issa has an entire entourage of German officials at his command. The photographers are there, too. No one is in a panic mode and no one seems to be in fear, that they might be attacked by a disguised gunman. What other Palestinian ‘terrorist’ could have such free rein, meeting with German officials, while holding hostages at the Olympic games? Where is the Mossad when you need them? Why didn’t they strike him down? They could have taken him out virtually immediately as he was essentially defenseless.

When mentioning German officials, let’s name them and try to see who they really were. The Munich 1972 Olympic event had a so-called crisis task force (Krisenstab) established, whose members were German federal interior minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher, Bavarian interior minister Bruno Merk, Munich police chief Manfred Schreiber, German Olympic committee president Willi Daume, international Olympic committee president Avery Brundage and state secretary Erich Kiesl. Another official with less significant role in this messy event was Conrad Ahlers, who acted as a PR mouthpiece on TV. With credits to one of my friends, I was able to add some juicy details that you are just about to read, with my [short] comments in brackets.

[Addendum 19.10.2017: Willy Brandt is a spook name. The chancellor was born as Herbert Ernst Karl Frahm, and as a spook went by the names Gunnar Gaasland, Felix Franke, Willy Flamme, Karl Martin and probably others. He was officially a socialist agent fighting the Nazis, which is laudable, but with Miles Mathis’ research on the origins of both socialism and Nazism, this could well make him a different sort of spook. Brandt’s official bio gives him a worker background, born out of wedlock to salesclerk Martha Frahm, never knowing his father John Möller. Brandt joined the socialist party SPD in 1930, but left already in 1931 to join the more radical-socialist SAPD, curiously founded by people like Siemens & Siemens, Seydewitz, Rosenfeld, Sternberg, Levi, Diamant, bearing the names of industrialist, aristocratic and Jewish families. In 1933 the Nazis forced the SAPD underground, and Brandt was sent as an agent on missions in France, Czechia, Norway, Spain, Holland, England, Sweden, Germany. No info about what he did there or what qualified him. He was captured several times, but always went free. His bio says he spoke perfect Norwegian, but not how he acquired this skill. His Gaasland identity was provided by the spouse of his former girlfriend Gertrud Meyer, who before WWII worked with 2 Jewish disciples of Sigmund Freud, Otto Fenichel and Wilhelm Reich, who theorized on the mass psychology of fascism. Brandt’s birth name Frahm today appears with many German celebrities, most notably Sabine Christiansen, born Frahm, who went from stewardess to famous talkshow host, while a Frahm politician was heading the public TV board. No explanation is given for the name Willy Brandt though, or why you’re allowed to keep spook names. Allegedly it was inspired by a silk store, or a ship chandler company. That’s just the name a socialist would keep for life, right? Yet it does appear often with industrialists, and maybe Brandt was one of them. There are indeed several genealogies online that consistently name as Brandt’s father or step-father one Lauritz Øyen Brandt, possibly related to Norwegian politician Lauritz Øyen. It could fit, as Brandt’s 2 cabinets both included one Lauritz Lauritzen, former manager in the Third Reich institute for chemistry. However, the Geni tree behind that father is so vast, that it would take an army of truthers to sift through. It goes back to the early 16th century, and connects Brandt to Oslo chief librarian Axel Drolsum, sign language teacher Andreas Møller, the composer brothers Friedrich and Carl Reissiger, and 3 generations Carl Loewe, one being born in Jerusalem, from around the time of cantor Carl Loewe, who wrote oratorios on Palestine and Jerusalem. Plus probably many non-artistic financiers and industrialists who like to be kept off Wikipedia. Willy Brandt is credited with a deescalation of the Cold War. But it seems he also presided over early attempts to replace it with the Terror Scare. So it seems that this secret elite genealogy may be closer to the truth.

Hans-Dietrich Genscher was an iconic figure in the tiny, yet ever-present (neo)liberal FDP party, known for high-level, corporate-type corruption. He was minister of the interior & foreign affairs under 3 chancellors, and instrumental in the forming of their governments. He had been a Nazi party member, claiming he was registered without his knowledge. In WWII, he was held captive first by US, then UK officials. For years after that, he’d disappear for months, officially to get medical treatment. His daughter married a general. He was protestant, but had a “personal relationship” with pope John Paul II. Both before and after his government posts, he worked at law firm BMT, experts in privatization and financial deregulation, who claim to have created Germany’s private radio market. Another BMT partner is named Frick. In the 80s, Genscher’s party FDP was caught in the Flick scandal, where their 2 economic ministers granted tax exemptions of 1 billion marks to billionaire war criminal Flick, who, through his dealings with the Nazis, had made a fortune with arms contracts, expropriation & slave labor, yet held an out-of-jail-almost-free card. A Frick was also a top Nazi from the beerhall putsch. All these names might be coincidences, of course. The name Genscher itself is rare, used by some NY Jews, but it’s one of many variants for Genzer, Ganzar or (Polish) Ganczarski, with many genealogies online, a lot of them Jewish. One curious genealogy even has a Genzer family marrying into a Brandt family: the Brandt Cemetery in Fayette County, TX. Were these regular Texan immigrants? Perhaps not: The Brandts aqcuired huge estates, and came there in 1885, after the “New Germany” project kickoff by the Nobility Society and its successors. Their cemetery is just a 30 min ride from the society’s luxury resort plantation named after Adolf, duke of Nassau. Miles Mathis has identified this Texas territory as the origin of many hoaxers. So, it might be that these Brandt and Genzer families have been working together on spook projects for generations.

Bruno Merk was Bavarian interior minister. He lost his left arm in Warsaw. His small hometown was the birthplace of Josef Mengele, whose family owned the largest factory there. As a politician, Merk is mainly remembered for centralizing state control in Bavaria. He nationalized the county police units, in several steps from 1970 to 1975, Munich last. Merk also introduced the first police helicopters to the Bavarian police in 1971, just in time for their grand appearance on the Olympic terror stage. The centralized police command also seemed vital for Merk’s district consolidation reform: He halved the number of counties, and force-incorporating many communities. One town refused to hand over their townhall files and barricaded the entrance, which was then stormed by the newly nationalized police. County resistance eventually undid this and other incorporations. Bruno Merk was knighted by pope John Paul II with the Gregory cross in 1999, but according to Merk’s trophy showcase, there had already been another knighting by pope Paul VI with the Sylvester cross in 1966, omitted in the official lists. We are left to wonder what he was knighted for. ]

Erich Kiesl was German secretary of state and part of the “crisis task force”. His biography [at Wikipedia here] would be of a typical Bavarian corruptocrat, if not for his education only. He studied at Jesuit college “School of Philosophy”, founded originally at the German intelligence town Pullach, which now houses the BND offices [Federal intelligence service in Germany]. Worked in public finance administration. Joined conservative party CSU, was patronaged by Bavarian godfather of corruption Franz Josef Strauß, comet-like rise, won mandates, then held public offices. Several corruption affairs where he gave public land away to cronies or helped with money laundering. Finally got convicted, paid only a laughable sum, allegedly attacked a bailiff.

Conrad Ahlers was the government spokesman who falsely presented the still ongoing, messy police attack as a completed success story in a press conference, 5 minutes before they all got killed in the official timeline[16]. His role in the event was small, but he is a major politics & media figure, much likely higher up the spook chain than it seems [his biography at Wikipedia here]. His father was a wealthy British merchant with out-of-jail-free card, see genealogy. His wife held an official nobility title: Heilwig von der Mehden. In WWII Conrad was a “batman”, a personal assistant to some (unknown) bigwig. Worked for BBC after war and joined conservative party CDU. Worked for government press office then worked for Germany’s “liberal” elite’s mouthpiece magazine Der Spiegel. He was the main “actor” and even incarcerated in the “Spiegel affair”, when Der Spiegel revealed state secrets about NATO war games and the German army’s minuscule role in them. Got out-of-jail-free though. Joined socialist-democratic party SPD, purported opposition to CDU. Worked for government press office again. Became MoP and worked in “defense” committee then worked for German international propaganda broadcaster »Deutsche Welle«. Retired to “work” in the Krupp family’s “charity”.

There is another name that should be mentioned in connection to the Munich 1972 Olympic incident, that of Udo Albrecht, a weird Nazi »terrorist«. On German Wikipedia page here, we can learn that »the terrorists were supported by German neo-Nazis in preparation of taking of the hostages and the establishment of the necessary infrastructure in Europe. Files of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), which were approved at the request of the Spiegel in June 2012, confirm this. The contacts between the PLO and the neo-Nazis were already established in 1970 by the right-wing extremist Udo Albrecht and should evolve into a cooperation in both ways«. Udo Albrecht has no public genealogy, but his biography is the spookiest. He is officially a Nazi terrorist, allegedly helped the PLO with the Munich Olympics kidnapping, his father and grandfather were Nazis. Got arrested and jailed for bank robbery and kidnapping in his youth, but managed to escape prison several times. Fought in Jordan in the original Black September, was caught by the Jordanians, but released again by a German politician (Hans-Jürgen Wischnewski, connected to many terror events). He was then caught in Vienna for his help in the Munich Olympics kidnapping, but escaped again after a transfer to Germany. Said to have become Nazi out of anti-communism and hatred for Russian invaders, but later worked for communist and pro-Russian East German intelligence, the Stasi. Also “had contacts” to Western German intelligence BND.

Returning to the official narrative, the Munich Olympic drama was not meant to end too soon. As Wikipedia leads, with my bolded text:

“At 4:30 pm, a squad of 38 German police was dispatched to the Olympic Village. Dressed in Olympic sweat suits (some also wearing Stahlhelme and carrying Walther MP sub-machine guns), they were members of the German border-police, although according to former Munich policeman Heinz Hohensinn they were regular Munich police officers, with no experience in combat or hostage rescue. Their plan was to crawl down from the ventilation shafts and kill the terrorists. The police took up positions awaiting the code word “Sunshine”, which upon hearing, they were to begin the assault. In the meantime, camera crews filmed the actions of the officers from the German apartments, and broadcast the images live on television. Thus, the terrorists were able to watch the police prepare to attack. Footage shows one of the kidnappers peering from the balcony door while one of the police officers stood on the roof less than 20 ft. (6 m) from him. In the end, after “Issa” threatened to kill two of the hostages, the police retreated from the premises.”

You just have to laugh at this, a TV camera filming police as they prepare to attack while »terrorists« are watching it on TV? Did any of them bring popcorn along?

Perched on a terrace directly above the Israeli quarters, a German policeman checks his submachine gun before advancing further.

A German policeman outside an apartment where Israeli hostages are held.

Shortly afterwards, the hijackers were granted their demand for an airplane and were taken to Fürstenfeldbruck, a NATO airbase.

Source: Time

They were supposed to fly to Cairo, Egypt, but the German police had another plan for them – an ambush and killing of all »terrorists« before they would take off. Wikipedia then leads with:

“Five German policemen were deployed around the airport in sniper roles—three on the roof of the control tower, one hidden behind a service truck and one behind a small signal tower at ground level. However, none of them had any special sniper training, nor any special weapon (being equipped with the H&K G3, the ordinary ass-ault rifle of the German Armed Forces without optics or night vision devices). The soldiers were selected because they shot competitively on weekends. During a subsequent German investigation, an officer identified as “Sniper No. 2” stated: “I am of the opinion that I am not a sharpshooter.”

I bolded some text above, although I should have bolded this paragraph in its entirety. It is simply unbelievable, as if Wiki is making fun of anyone who reads it. There is the ultimate hostage drama at the Olympic games, the whole world is following it on TV, yet all German authorities can do is to send in a few untrained policemen? Moreover, they were planning to deploy sharpshooters without sniper guns, which makes me doubt the intent of such tactics. There are two options with this – they would either succeed or fail at the attempt, but such a plan as proposed above indisputably leads to mission failure. I will never believe that the German authorities in charge could have been dumb or inexperienced enough to not figure that out.

So on the rooftop we have 5 sharpshooters with no snipers, while an additional 16 German police officers are preparing an ambush, disguised as crew, on the plane that was waiting for Issa & stooges on the runway. Let me here quote my friend Josh, as he has commented it so well:

»My favorite part of the Munich story is where the German police disguise themselves as flight personnel to ambush the Black Septembrists on the plane that was waiting for them on the tarmac to take them to Egypt. Apparently, at the last minute they realized it was a suicide mission (not clear why) and voted to abandon the mission and then just left. They were never punished, from what I can tell, nor does it seem there was ever any follow-up or inquest, even though this decision ultimately led to everyone (allegedly) dying. Apparently German police can just vote whether to follow orders or not. There’s a documentary where they interview Zvi Zamir, who was head of the Mossad then, and after talking about this incident he just looks at the camera and says “unbelievable” with a look on his face like he’s really daring the audience not to believe it: link «.

Looking at the pictures of Fürstenfeldbruck airbase part of the event reveals some very dubious details. Look at this below picture very closely and try to notice existing patterns, for instance. How many can you see?

Another curious researcher has marked some very important details of this above picture, patterns that cannot be overlooked. To add weight to his findings, if you zoom in on it really close, you will be able to notice a strange white blur around each human figure in the focus. These findings strongly suggest source picture[17] was badly tampered with:

 

Another issue that is well worth mentioning and is usually omitted at popular mainstreamed sources, is the fact that police psychologist Georg Sieber imagined 26 ways the 1972 Summer Olympics could go terribly wrong[18]. »Commissioned by organizers to predict worst-case scenarios for the Munich games, Sieber came up with a range of possibilities, from explosions to plane crashes, for which security teams should be prepared.

Situation Number 21 was eerily prescient, as TIME would describe many years later. Sieber envisioned that “a dozen armed Palestinians would scale the perimeter fence of the [Olympic] Village. They would invade the building that housed the Israeli delegation, kill a hostage or two (“To enforce discipline,” Sieber says today), then demand the release of prisoners held in Israeli jails and a plane to fly to some Arab capital.” The West German organizers balked, asking Sieber to downsize his projections from cataclysmic to merely disorderly — from worst-case to simply bad-case scenarios. Situations such as Number 21 could only be prevented by scrapping the Olympics entirely, they argued. Instead of beefing up security, they scaled back their expectations of threat«.

In the aftermath on this Munich 1972 Olympic village attack, we can notice that 3 remaining attackers, namely Jamal Al-Gashey, Mohammed Safady and Adnan Al-Gashey, were arrested and jailed in Munich’s prison. Interestingly enough, all were soon released, when German authorities exchanged them for hostages from another airplane hijacking in the case of Lufthansa Flight 615. What followed was an Israeli retribution mission, which is now widely known as »Operation Wrath of God« or Mivtza Za’am Ha’El. Golda Meir, fourth Israeli Prime Minister and the Israeli Defense Committee secretly authorized the Mossad to track down and kill those allegedly responsible for the Munich massacre[19]. As Wikipedia leads with:

”The third surviving gunman, Jamal Al-Gashey, was known to be alive as of 1999, hiding in North Africa or in Syria, claiming to still fear retribution from Israel. He is the only one of the surviving terrorists to consent to interviews since 1972, having granted an interview in 1992 to a Palestinian newspaper, and having briefly emerged from hiding in 1999 to participate in an interview for the film One Day in September, during which he was disguised and his face shown only in blurry shadow.”

Interesting enough, some TV journalists should have received a job offer as secret agents, since they were able to find Jamal for the purpose of interviewing him, while Mossad’s unparalleled force of special secret service agents could not locate and execute him.

But there is even more flabbergasting piece of information available at Wikipedia. At the English site of Munich 1972 Olympic event, they say that:

“Of those believed to have planned the massacre, only Abu Daoud, the man who claims that the attack was his idea, is known to have died of natural causes.”

Picture’s caption from the source here: Photo dated 11 January 1977 of Palestinian leader Abu Daoud (centre), who admits responsibility for the terrorist attack against Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich, being driven to Orly airport under police protection after being freed by French authorities. Abu Daoud, whose real name is Mohammed Daoud Odeh, was barred from entering France 03 May 1999 on grounds that he was on an unwanted list. Abu Daoud arrived at Orly airport from Tunis to promote his autobiography, but was immediately turned back by customs officials.

This is really becoming a hilarious story. I beg your pardon? The alleged mastermind of the ultimate terrorist incident of the 1970’s comes »knocking« at their doors and they let him go? Is there any official left in France and Germany with some portion of functioning brain? Yet Mossad’s agents seem to be just as lame as their German of French counterparts[20]:

“When French police arrested Abu Daoud, one of the chief organizers of the Munich massacre, and inquired about extraditing him to Germany, Bavaria’s justice secretary Alfred Seidl (de)recommended that Germany should not take any action, causing the French to release Abu Daoud and the Assad regime to shelter him until he died at a Damascus hospital in 2010.”

I had to read that twice. Can you believe it? There should not be an inquiry about arresting Daoud, who claims to be the mastermind of some serious attack, where many people were allegedly murdered. If Germany did not want to deal with Daoud, why did they not check with Israel? In 1977, 5 years after the Munich incident and 4 years after Israel introduced the »Wrath of God« mission to track and execute all Palestinians involved in Munich incident[21], I strongly believe French intelligence had to know that Israel was more than interested in locating Abu Daoud. I as well believe French intelligence agency was briefed and informed about it. But since this event was not real, and the terrorists were part of the con, there was never any need to arrest anyone.

Let’s look at the Bavaria justice secretary Alfred Seidl before we continue with Daoud. Seidl turns to be another spooky character involved, his Wikipedia biography here reads like a thriller. It says Seidl’s career started when Germany was ruled by the Nazi party in 1935, after studying law and economics at the University of Munich. Until 1938 he was an assistant at the university there and later promoted along with Edmund Mezger when WWII broke out. His work tried to scientifically support the “national socialist law of will” (nationalsozialistische Willensstrafrech) as he was actually a member of the NSDAP from 1937 to 1940. From 1940, Seidl was a member of the Wehrmacht and in 1945 he »settled down« as a lawyer in Munich.

Seidl gained special prominence as a defender in the Nüremberg trials. In the trial against the main war criminals before the International Military Court he defended Rudolf Hess and Hans Frank. Till the end of life, Seidl was committed to the rehabilitation of Rudolf Hess. In the Wilhelmstraßen-Prozess he was the defender of the former Reich Minister and head of the Staatskanzlei Hans Heinrich Lammers[22]. In the so-called Pohl Process (United States of America vs. Oswald Pohl, et al. (Case No. 4)), he defended Oswald Pohl[23], in the Nuremberg Medical Process[24] (United States of America vs. Karl Brandt, et al. 1), he defended Fritz Fischer, Karl Gebhardt and Herta Oberheuser in the IG Farben process[25], he defended Walter Dürrfeld, as well as Ilse Koch[26] in the Augsburg process.

In the civil process of the former forced laborer Norbert Wollheim against the I.G. Farbenindustrie AG i.L. from 1951 to 1957, the first lawsuit of a forced laborer for damages against a German industrial company, he represented the defendant as a lawyer. Even in later criminal proceedings at German courts, Seidl defended Nazi perpetrators, for example, the local physician of the concentration camp Flossenbürg Hermann Fischer.

Returning back to the essence about Abu Daoub, if French intelligence service were not in the know about Abu Daoub, nobody would arrest him at Orly airport as there would be no information available to make an arrest. Yet they missed an opportunity to help and disable future actions of allegedly notorious criminal. If you think only the French and German intelligence services would be so sloppy, you are wrong:

“Abu Daoud was allowed safe passage through Israel in 1996 so he could attend a PLO meeting convened in the Gaza Strip for the purpose of rescinding an article in its charter that called for Israel’s eradication.”

My goodness, maybe we are all misinformed and Mossad actually employs good-hearted individuals, whose job is to help disabled and weakened elderly people cross the street on their way from the grocery. Leaving sarcasm out of my suggestion, it is obvious Abu Daoud is yet another mole within BSO or PLO, doesn’t it?[27]

Historical documents released to Der Spiegel by the German secret service show that Dortmund police had been aware of collaboration between Abu Daoud and neo-Nazi Willi Pohl (aka E. W. Pless and, since 1979, officially named Willi Voss) seven weeks before the attack[28]. In 1970’s Pohl was a member of the German neo-Nazi scene with relations to the criminal milieu and to PLO and other »terrorist« organizations. The contact had been made by Neo-Nazi Udo Albrecht, with whom Pohl was a friend for several years. As a PLO member, he organized weapons for Palestinian »terrorist« commanders in Germany.

Pohl helped the »terrorist« of the BSO Abu Daud in the planning and execution of the Munich 1972 Olympic incident, according to his own statement. After the assassination attempt, he was arrested at the end of October 1972 with weapons and Black September’s threatening letter. Pohl was condemned to a two-year and two-month imprisonment in 1974, in spite of the crushing defect. Four days after the judge’s speech, the terrorist accomplices were already free again and set off for Beirut. Pohl has retired from terrorism decades ago.

In December 2012, Der Spiegel reported that Pohl, according to his own statements, has been spying as the agent for the CIA at the center of the PLO secret service since 1975. He is said to have provided information on attacks in the Middle East and Europe under the cover name of Ganymede and was involved in the collaboration between neo-Nazi Udo Albrecht and his accomplices with the Palestinians. Another German source[29] writes that before the break in their friendship, Albrecht and Pohl were closely interwoven. They had the same lawyer in Germany, the Recklinghausener Wilhelm Schöttler, who is a member of a number of German-Bavarian associations, and in 1972 he had represented the surviving Munich Olympic alleged assassins as an attorney.

For the last section of this piece, I would like to touch on the alleged victims of Munich 1972 incident. While working on the subject I already realized, that most probably there would be no quality pictures of those alleged victims, which leaves me only to speculate about them. Here are some rare pictures:

Looking at the alleged corpse’s leg section, right under the »10« sign, from its hip to knee – what was supposed to be femor (large tie bone), looks more like an exposed metal part. The same could be said about his knee, which looks more like a complicated metal part. Its lower right foot is completely missing with only ashes remaining, yet some 20-30cm above there can be noticed some relatively undamaged section of lower leg, which is then again badly damaged above knee. I suggest here this is not a real human body that was partially incinerated. I noticed that white blur around the edges of helicopter’s remains when zoomed in, which indicates this picture may have been manipulated.

Dubious part of this picture is noticing white shirt on his chest (as opposed to red stained), which would suggest Romano was shot in the back. I find that strange, since mainstream sources claim he was fighting with the attackers, which would imply he was faced front to them. From this angle it is impossible to be certain whether we are actually looking at Romano, even if it was a high-resolution picture.

I can notice nothing in particular with this picture, but there is nothing conclusive about it as well. The only thing that makes me wonder is the absence of any visible blood stains, quite an unusual marker for anybody shot dead in a massive shoot-out. Supposedly, we are looking at one of the dead attackers, obviously shot in the back.

We are here supposedly looking at three Palestinian attackers, the one in the middle is supposed to be dead. From left to right: Sirimer Mohammed Abdullah, Ibrahim Mosoud Badran and Abed Kair Al Dnawly.

To conclude with a quote from Time article published on 18th September 1972, with my bolded text :

»The difficulty of concerting international action was demonstrated last week when 17 nations met in Washington to seek agreement on measures against skyjackers — and failed. Even if governments could agree, the Black September gangsters would be hard to eliminate, since they move so stealthily. Quite probably, the world will have to endure more Munichs before it learns how to curb them.

To counter the guerrilla terror, governments everywhere will have to pay far closer attention to security—not only on airliners, as they are learning to do, but at almost any public event or occasion that terrorists could disrupt, as they did the Olympics. Perhaps the ultimate significance of last week’s horror in Munich is that the historic, bloody conflict between the Israelis and Arabs has now been exported from the Middle East to the rest of the world, first to Western Europe, and maybe eventually even to the U.S«

There it was, the essence of the terror agenda, right in front of our eyes for decades already, waiting to be re-discovered and finally understood. And that, my dear readers, may be the most important message of this manufactured Munich 1972 Olympic incident: it presaged and helped lay the foundation for the new essence of our counterfeit reality, culminating on 9/11 2001, bringing to life a monstrous myth.

 

 

---

Additional resources:

Full documentary »One day in September« , here

[1]https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiselnahme_von_M%C3%BCnchen#Terror-Bek.C3.A4mpfung_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland

[2] ZDF documentary; Der Olympiamord

[3] Wikipedia here calls it a “massacre”

[4] Andreas Baader and Ulrike Meinhof are the founding members of Red Army Faction (RAF) also known as the Baader Meinhof Gang after its two leaders. Mainstreamed version says it was originally inspired by the 1960s student protests against the Vietnam war and other anti-US demonstrations. When the protesters became radicalized they sought to make their point with bomb attacks, assassinations and kidnappings across West Germany. I would suggest here these two stooges were planted as controlled opposition, radicalized on paper only, with the sole purpose to demonize legitimate anti-Vietnam movement in Europe. Something similar to what Tate murders did to hippie and anti-Vietnam movement in USA.

[5] I have bolded the numbers for numerology / gematria experts, but have left my commentary on these numbers out at this point, until I feel confident enough to discuss them.

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_September_Organization#Origin

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_September_Organization#Origin

[8] There are several points where it may be understood as if I took the Palestinian resistance and the PLO at face value. I feel fairly certain that Palestinian resistance has been just as much (mis)led and co-opted and controlled as any other similar organization.

[9] Strangely, though, none of these authors ever had any thoughts about the possible fakery interlaced with intelligence work, agents and TV/media manipulation. However, I found Patrick Seale’s work revealing enough of the truth to realize who are we dealing with in the case of Sabri al-Banna alias Abu Nidal. I did not have enough motivation to thoroughly examine Seale’s work and see in particular where he might be misleading or omitting any facts. I have presumed some of his conclusions as common sense and therefore included them as such.

[10] The Abu Nidal Organization took the name from its founder Sabri al-Banna, but like other terrorist organizations, it also went by a variety of other names. Here are some of the common ones:

• Arab Revolutionary Brigades (ARB)
• Arab Revolutionary Council
• Black June Organization (BJO)
• Black September Organization (BSO)
• Fatah al-Qiyadah al-Thawriyyah
• Fatah Revolutionary Council (FRC)
• Revolutionary Organization of Socialist Muslims (ROSM)
• Fatah the Revolutionary Council (FRC)

[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Israeli_raid_on_Lebanon

[12] https://www.behindthename.com/submit/names/usage/jewish/4

[13]Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luttif_Afif#Early_life ; or https://www.facebook.com/LesJuifsduMaroc/posts/962600020450647

[14] Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luttif_Afif#The_Munich_massacre

[15] https://youtu.be/OWpDakecH04?t=145

[16]https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiselnahme_von_M%C3%BCnchen#6..C2.A0September_1972.2C_fr.C3.BCher_Morgen

[17] You may have noticed that the author of the linked video used another picture to draw his lines and circles over while making his point ; I presumed it was done with the purpose to avoid any copyright claims of picture’s author and to further avoid the video being removed from YT. I used instead a high-resolution picture depicting the very same scene so you can see much more details when zooming and analyzing it – the essence has though remained the same.

[18] Found here: http://time.com/3223225/munich-anniversary/

[19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_massacre#Israeli_response

[20] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_massacre#Abu_Daoud

[21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wrath_of_God

[22] Hans Heinrich Lammers was a German judge, administrative jurist and ministerial official. In the time of National Socialism, he was head of the Imperial Chancellery. In the Wilhelmstraßen process he was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment in 1949 because of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Source

[23] Oswald Ludwig Pohl was a German SS leader and general of the Waffen-SS. As head of the SS Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), Pohl played a key role in the implementation of the alleged Holocaust. As a war criminal Pohl was sentenced to death during the Nüremberg trials and allegedly executed in 1951. Source

[24] The accused were 20 concentration camp doctors as well as one lawyer and two administrative specialists as organizers of medical crimes. 14 of the defendants had already been named responsible in the trial against the main war criminals. Some perpetrators had died, some had committed suicide or had already been convicted in the Dachau trials. The whereabouts of some perpetrators were unknown and evidence was not yet available. The final selection of the defendants was therefore aimed at accusing leading representatives of the “national medical services” of the national socialist state. Source

[25] It was the sixth of a total of twelve successor Nüremberg trials against those responsible in the German Reich at the time of National Socialism. The verdicts were used to punish “looting” of foreign companies in the former German enemy countries of Poland, Norway, France and the Soviet Union. Another offense was “enslavement”, the planned use of forced laborers from the concentration camp Auschwitz III Monowitz, built especially for the construction of the Buna works. Also the production of poison gas (cyclone B) and its delivery to the SS for extermination purposes in concentration camps was treated in the process. Source

[26] Ilse Koch was the wife of the camp commander of the Buchenwald concentration camp, Karl Otto Koch. In the post-war period, she was internationally known as the “Witch of Buchenwald” and was condemned to imprisonment by both an American court and a German court.

[27] When searching the web for some clues about Abu Daoud, I have discovered another mainstream source, where I learned that Ehud Barak, former Israeli prime minister, was once the military commander of the operation Bayonet, where the group of commandos allegedly targeted and eventually killed 3 leaders of Black September at once. Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4627388.stm

[28] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_massacre#Abu_Daoud

[29] http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14342646.html