Was Gavrilo Princip an Agent? Part II

There is something about the alleged assassin, Gavrilo Princip, that is still bothering me and I do not know why exactly. When thinking about something like that, which led me with my research to this point, it is my curiousity that is posing my biggest question, after all learned about the history of single most important event of 1914, it was still not answered : was Gavrilo possibly Jewish? Was he as well one of crypto-Jews that seem to be the usual suspects in such hoaxes as this alleged assassin of Franz Ferdinand? Et tu, Gavrilus? Were his companions, brothers-in-arms, any different? Are we looking at a sinister pattern here?

As I was re-searching for all possible clues or evidence that would help me make such suggestion and firmly stand behind it, I discovered yet another subject that was not tought in schools and it shocked me to learn about it. All of you, who don’t mind learning some history from a new angle, will find this essay interesting enough to see how such proverbial saying as »history is written by the winners« is overleaping with reality. This time, with no philosophical dilemma about such (proverb).

Let me lead on with a few pictures issued a while ago at main MSM outlet covering major region of Bosnia in modern times :

This is the first picture that Blic’s site starts with:

gavrilo-car-1

It is noted as :»Franz Ferdinand’s car at the time when he was assassined«. So now you are prepared to see cars involved so here is where it starts :

gavrilo-car-2

It is noted as : »Chaotic scene on the streets of Sarajevo after Ferdinand’s murder«. And is most surely is chaotic scenery that we are looking at, but then at the source they lead into this picture with the official story of alleged planning of Archduke’s assassination by Dimitrijević as Intelligence connection to the plot. Below the picture at the source site is just another part of the official narrative further told, so one might get the feeling that this is the scenery just after the alleged assassination. Surely, you remember that hand grenades were involved, so you do not wonder when you see the picture insinuating chaos afterwards.

Here is another one :

gavrilo-car-3

Noted as : »A mass of people gathered to see what happened. Nobody could have even dreamed about, that they just witnessed an event, that would make WW I happen«.

And another one:

gavrilo-car-4

Noted as: »The vehicle, in which Ferdinand was, after the assassination took place«. That makes two of these picture directly put forward as »proof« of devastation made by hand-grenade while attempt was made to kill Archduke.

And that makes it a disgraceful lie as these pictures are not directly connected to the Archduke’s murder. Luckily for me, a commenter left a comment, warning the source’s author about misdirection when publishing incorrectly noted pictures within an article, but with no change to the article made after it was made clear such pictures were incorrectly asserting another reality. As it is a fact, these pictures were made shortly afterward the alleged assassination of Archduke, some of them during the same day of 28th June 1914, some on the following day of 29th June 1914. However, the mob is not looking at the devastation made by the hand-granade, they are looking at the devastation made by some of them standing there. As much as ou may be surprised or confused by my previous sentence, let me repeat in other words : these above pictures were made shortly after the news about Archduke’s death was released to the public, which then organized the pogroms against all Serbian population, nation-wide. Not even in my wildest dreams could I’ve imagined this, it got me by complete surprise. This time, Wickedpedia seems to be holding quite substantial data about it at its entry here, hosting even some pictures not to be found anywhere else, about the anti-Serbs riots in Sarajevo after MSM published news about Archduke’s death by assasssination.

Another picture of the aftermath:

1914-06-29_-_aftermath_of_attacks_against_serbs_in_sarajevo

As you can see, the time is shown as approximately 08:17, which was roughly 17 minutes after the mob gathered:

»On 29 June 1914, more aggressive demonstrations began at around 8 o’clock in the morning and quickly assumed the characteristics of a pogrom.[12] Large groups of Muslims and Croats gathered on the streets of Sarajevo shouting and singing while carrying black-draped Austrian flags and pictures of the Austrian emperor and late archduke. Local political leaders held speeches to these crowds.”

As it is then further said:

»Many residents of Sarajevo applauded to the crowd as they watched the events from their windows while authorities reported that demonstrators enjoyed widespread support amongst the non-Serb population of the city.[14]«

Just horrible to realize, yet it may help to understand better by the following :

»The Italian consul in Sarajevo stated that the events were financed by the Austro-Hungarian government. The German consul, described as being “anything but a friend of Serbs”, reported that Sarajevo was experiencing its own St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre« [i]

As we were tought about the timeline of events, shortly after the alleged assassination, on 23rd July 1914 Austro-Hungarian Empire issued and Ultimatum to Serbia with ten demands, where all of them were to be accepted unconditionally within 48 hours or else….we all know what came to be, right? By the way, what followed on 28th July 1914 as declaration of Austria’s war against Serbia, was delivered – by a telegram in French language, via Bucharest post office:

telegram-declaration-of-war-to-serbia

Not to get de-railed while searching for the answer about Gavrilo and his companions, let me return to the subject and look firstly at some members of assassins’ group. What is interesting to add here is that following an amnesty of political prisoners by Charles I of Austria done in 1917, one of alleged conspirators involved in the Sarajevo assassination was released from imprisonment, namely Vladimir (Vaso) Ćorović.

vladimir_corovic

As he asserts in his book, »The Black Book«, where he documented anti-Serb pogroms after 28th July 1914, translated as written in Serbian language:

»First demonstrations were organized in Zagreb on the very same day of assassination.«.

Whereas the author continues asserting what Croatian media outlets were publishing on leaflets and in newspaper articles in days following the Sarajevo assassination. There are such extreme nationalistic quotes written in the Čorović’s book, with references to newspaper’s articles full of hatred content, that I’m left astounded, quoting a softer one :

»Both criminals are fanatic Serbs, sons of that accursed tribe that is planting enmity, manslaughter and murder wherever they roam, and while grasping for power villainly destroying everything in front of them, they arrogantly think Croatian nation will be intimidated with it.«.

The author Valdimir Ćorović himself is a questionable persona, as he was pardoned by Franz Ferdinand’s successor, Charles I of Austria in 1917 after serving »only« 3 years out of his 20 year sentence. As we can learn about the Wickedpedia about Vladimir Ćorović, he spent many years of his career abroad staying at Vienna, Munich, Bologna and Paris before the assassination, where he might have been engaged as an agent. Returning from imprisonment in 1917, he had a remarkable academic career becoming one of more prolific Serbian authors with more than 1.000 published pieces. If anything was agent-like in his life though, it was a moment of his alleged death – he died in a plane crash on 12th April 1941 somewhere in Greece, shot down from the sky for his open anti-Nazi activities prior to the WW II.

Very disturbing find is as well some Wickedpedia text on yet another member of the Black Hand secret society, namely Vladimir Gaćinović. After Gaćinović finished gymnasium in the city of Mostar, he went to study abroad, staying in Geneve and Lozane, where he was in the company of Russian revolutionaries who emigrated from Russia after a failed 1905 revolutions.

vladimir_gacinovic

Gaćinović was a personal friend of many Russian revolutionaries, such as Viktor Serge (born as Victor Lvovich Kibalchich), Mark Natanson, Julius Martov and Leon Trotsky (born as Lev Davidovich Bronstein). After 1910 he went to Vienna University until 1912, when he joined troops fighting in the First Balcan War where he fought as a volunteer within Montenegro army. It is well-known that Gaćinović was in contact with Gavrilo Princip and Danilo Ilić, who later became alleged assassins. As the story goes, Gaćinović was allegedly poisoned with arsenic in 1917 while visiting in Fribourg, Switzerland, aged 27 years at the time of his death.

Another Black Hand society member was Nedeljko Čabrinović as we can learn at his Wickedpedia entry here, he allegedly died aged 21 years old in the Terezín, then in Austro-Hungarian Empire.

nedeljko_cabrinovic

As it turns, there are already three of the accused alleged assassins worth serious doubt about their role in this alleged Sarajevo assassination for their possible engagement by the Russian crypto-Jew controlled and planted revolutionaries. Not stopping there, looking into next on the list of alleged assassins we find Trifko Grabež:

trifko-grabez

You may argue if there exists a less penciled facial picture of Trifko Grabež that I could bring in here, but unfortunately, there is none better to be found on the web, which is by itself very strange. He was also a member of the Black Hand society, with his early life story at Wickedpedia written – full of holes. He was allegedly expelled from high school for striking a teacher, left home and went to Belgrade, where he continued his education? Staying where exactly, who was paying for his expenses in his teens? Falling under influence of other nationalists, says Wickedpedia, he joined the Black Hand society.

Here is a picture of three Archduke’s assassins together:

grabez_cabrinovic_princip

From left : Trifko Grabež, Nedeljko Čabrinović and Gavrilo Princip in may 1914, at Kalemegdan, Serbia

Grabež looks completely different than in his solo portrait picture with exception to mustache noticed on his face, Čabrinović looks too old to be seen as a 21-year old man, with Gavrilo resembling at most to his alleged portrait picture we’re used to recognize as de-picturing him.

For easier facial comparison and memory re-fleshing purposes, all three alleged assassins individual portrait picture once again:

To return at this point to Gavrilo Princip himself, I would refer all readers to one of the threads found at vnnforum.com, dedicated to the very same question I had when starting this essay: Was Gavrilo Princip a Jew? Here is what is posted there:

»Gavrilo Princip was said to be part of a world-wide plot by the Freemasons. Erich von Ludendorff, the Chief of the German Staff, called Princip a “Jew” and alleged that he was part of a Freemason plot in collusion with Austrian, German, and Hungarian Freemasons. Julius Streicher’s official Nazi Party periodical Volkischer Beobachter in a January 8, 1936 article stated that Princip was “a Jew and a Freemason”.

He didn’t look Serbian or Slavic yet he claimed to be a Yugoslav nationalist who wanted to unite all southern Slavs.

The point is that he was just an excuse for what was already being planned. War was inevitable when Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia.

The annexation and reactions to the annexation were what contributed to the start of the war.«

Erich von Ludendorff was mentioned several times in »The Beer Hall Putsch« , a piece done by Miles Mathis, in which he asserts, while deconstructing Hitler’s story and the event itself :

»In 1923, in the lead-up to the Putsch, Hitler enlisted the help of General Ludendorff to try to convince the Bavarian leaders to join him in moving against Berlin.  Do you recognize that name?  Ludendorff was supposed to have been running Germany in early 1918, remember?  He is the one who after WW1 popularized the Stab-in-the-Back theory that Hitler’s is supposed to have co-opted.  This was the idea that Marxists had caused the fall of Germany in that year, which we now know was all misdirection away from the Industrialists.  But that begs this question: why would General Ludendorff ally himself a few years later to Hitler, a 33-year-old ex-lance corporal who was now the head of a Workers’ Party? After their failure to drive around the Marxists in 1919, these Workers’ Parties had suffered defeat and been forced to join the fake Marxists.  That’s right: the real Workers’ Parties or Unions in the early years of the Weimar Republic were not rightist pre-Nazi organizations, they were center-left organizations that had to ally themselves to the Socialist structure of the new government in order to prosper at all.   So why would Ludendorff ally himself to those who had stabbed him in the back?  The last person Ludendorff should have been consulting with was Hitler, unless. . . .

Unless both Ludendorff and Hitler were still agents, and this whole story is another cover.«

Mathis mentioned Ludendorff 18 times in above referenced essay, which I would strongly encourage everybody coming here to read and learn about it themselves. All I would like to add to Ludendorff’s statement about Gavrilo Princip being a Jew – it takes one to know one. This connection suggests already five people in our story of Sarajevo assassination connected to TPTB, all of them obviously being agents, each of their own kind, placed (t)here to perpetrate their sinister plans.

To relate back to the vnnforum.com, leading on with the post found there:

»In the past I found it very difficult to find any good or definitive sources on Gavrilo Princip being either a Jew or a Freemason. However, I did eventually find in William G. Simpson’s »Which Way Western Man?« something worth noting. I will reproduce later in this post the section on World War One from Chapter 19, Part C (a large part focusing on the Jews) as well as the footnotes.

 You can see that footnote 239 is his source on the statement that Princip was a Jew. The source is »Freemasonry and Judaism: The Secret Powers Behind Revolution« by Vicomte Leon de Poncins. A scan of that entire book is available here:

http://www.archive.org/details/FreemasonryAndJudaism

I didn’t look through it, but I do know that Poncins actually makes a few mistakes.

Here is the work from Oliver (Christianity and the Survival of the West) that Simpson refers to:

http://home.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/oliver.html

This is the only place where Oliver mentions Leon de Poncins: 

“The most comprehensive and scholarly survey of Jewish pressures on, and infiltration of, Christianity from the earliest times is the work of one of the most learned ecclesiastical historians of our day and is now available in a passable English translation: The Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay. The virtual capture of the Catholic Church in recent years, which has been celebrated in articles in Look and other periodicals, is ably described by Vicomte Leon de Poncins in his Judaism and the Vatican. No Protestant scholar, so far as I know, has made a comparable study of Protestant denominations. It would be difficult to take exception to the reporting of historical facts in the two books that I have cited, and let us not question the authors’ conclusions. Do they adequately explain the decline of Christianity?”

The trouble is, he’s talking about an entirely different book. We can’t be sure that Poncins was as accurate in this cited book as he is in the one Oliver refers to. Furthermore, I think Oliver does often exaggerate on various things, but that’s not important here.

Simpson’s work[ii]:

The First World War

 

By William G. Simpson

The pros and cons of how the First World War got started it is manifestly impossible to discuss here in any detail. But it may be categorically stated that among competent historians who have had access to the latest evidence, the idea that Germany was guilty of wanting the war, planning for it or starting it, is completely discredited.232 Professor Sidney B. Fay, head of the Department of History at Smith College and later one of Roosevelt’s “Court Historians,” attaches critical importance to the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, with which the war began. Without that, war might have been completely avoided.

“The murder of the Archduke,” he says, “ignited material which would not otherwise have taken fire as it did, or perhaps at all. It is, therefore, of importance to trace the origins of the plot in which he fell a victim and to determine the responsibility for the deed which was to have such awful and world-racking consequences.” 233

For a background for one’s investigation, one needs to bear in mind the statement of Walter Rathenau, five years before the war broke out, that a self-perpetuating body of three hundred men, all known to one another, controlled the destiny of Europe. It would seem that with all this power, they could have prevented war if they had wished to. Perhaps, indeed, war was what they wanted.234 One remembers again Disraeli’s cryptic remark about the course of events’ being manipulated from behind the scenes—and his observation that at that time Jews were at the helm of every important country of Europe. So that one has to wonder whether, offstage, behind the statesmen who stood in the limelight, there were not other men, perhaps of Jewish race, who, for purposes of their own, worked up and worked upon old international jealousies, fears, and antagonisms; slipped ideas into the minds of figurehead statesmen; and at critical moments were at their elbows to bait and to bribe, to threaten and to coerce. And there are, also, the not very cryptic words in speeches by two very powerful Jews, on momentous occasions, in which one of them, fifteen years before the event, predicted the war which would bring forth the promise of Palestine;235 and in which the other, in reviewing the assassination, the war, and the hold on Palestine they got out of the war, represented these events as the achievement of Jewish power and intrigue.236

 But lest this seem too cloak-and-daggerish, and too full of mere suggestion and suspicion, let me now proceed to set down known facts.

 Everything is ready. The U.S., with the Federal Reserve firmly fastened upon it, has been yoked for the decisive part it is to play. And Europe itself, beneath its surface, is a fierce welter of fears and hates and murderous passions. The long-standing conspiracy between France and Russia for the destruction of Germany has done its work: they know each other.237 It has long been recognized that the Balkans are “the powder keg of Europe.” Serbia in particular is the readied percussion cap, needing only to be struck to set off an earth-rocking explosion. And plans have been laid to have it struck. In 1912, the Revue internationale des societes secretes (i.e., The International Review of Secret Societies) published a few prophetic words by a high Swiss Freemason in regard to Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of Austria, to which Serbia was subject: “He is a remarkable man; it is a pity that he is condemned, he will die on the steps of his throne.” 238 Within two years the Archduke and his wife were assassinated by several Serbian Freemasons. The fatal shots were fired by one Princip, a Jew.239 This assassination “served as the spark which lit the conflagration in Europe.” 240

 Professor Fay reviews the shorthand record of the trial of the young assassins in November 1914, which he declared “a fascinating human document” and pronounced “full and fair.” 241 One of them testified that “the Freemasons had already condemned to death the heir to the throne two years ago,” and again, “In Freemasonry it is permitted to kill.” 242 He describes the “Black Hand” terrorist organization for achieving the freedom of Serbia. Machinery was already installed by which Freemasons, plotting in Belgrade, under secret orders from unidentified Masons yet higher up in Vienna (or for that matter, in Paris or St. Petersburg) could step in and use the Serbian feud with Austria to start a world war for ends of their own.

 He recounts the formation of the conspiracy. But the plot was actually hatched in France, at Toulouse, where three of the terrorists met in January 1914. Here one of them “came into direct touch with various Russian revolutionists, including Trotsky.” 243 The purpose in going to France was—it would seem manifest—to meet the men “higher up” who would decide who was to be killed, and when and where, and who would provide the necessary money and arms.

 What I have been implying is that I believe the Jews started the war. And after the evidence that I have already submitted, perhaps this will not strike my readers as too farfetched. But I will add that Henry Ford put it on record that some “very prominent” Jews insisted, in conversation with him, that it was their own people who contrived the war, precipitated it, and so controlled it that it would stop only when they wanted it stopped.244

 In view of the profits accruing to the financiers, it is understandable why they should have pushed the nations into it and done their best to keep it going. Mr. A.K. Chesterton, writing in his The New Pioneer in June 1939, stated that Britain’s Board of Inland Revenue “estimated that 340,000 [persons] made £2,846,000 out of the war and 3620 made £707,000,000, bringing their total wealth up to £1,995,000,000.”

In any case, the war got started and ran its course.

 By 1916, it seemed to have reached a stalemate. Both sides were desperate. Germany’s submarines had brought Britain to the point where her people were only two weeks ahead of their food supply. And the Allied encirclement of the Central Powers had forced them to fight on more fronts than they could effectively man. Out of the common desperation, the Jews were able to achieve two of their chief objectives. In what follows, it must be remembered that, as always, the Jews in all countries communicated and cooperated freely across all national boundaries. Few gentiles were aware that while Paul Warburg (with his Kuhn, Loeb & Co.) was dominating the situation here, his blood brother Max had the Kaiser under his thumb in Germany.

 

Footnotes

  1. See, for instance, Harry Elmer Barnes—Genesis of the World War, Knopf, 1929, p. 679, where he says that the gradual unearthing of the original documents bearing on the First World War, its causes, events and results, had forced every “competent and honest authority on the problem of war guilt” to reverse what for long years was the prevailing judgment as to who started the war. See also Sidney B. Fay—The Origins of the World War, Macmillan, 1929, Vol. I, p. 2ff. Arthur Bryant, Prof. of History at Oxford, records that “in 1935 a joint Commission of German and French historians unanimously agreed that no deliberate desire for a European war could be attributed to any particular Government or people in 1914.” American Historical Review, 1938. Cp. Francis Neilson, op. cit., p. 21: “No historian of any repute today believes that Germany was solely responsible for the war.”
  2. Sidney B. Fay—The Origins of the World War, Vol. II, p. 53.
  3. Leon de Poncins—Secret Powers Behind Revolution, Boswell, 1929, pp. 78-80, where he quotes a long passage from General Ludendorf’s Kriegshetze Und Volkermordern, Munchen, 1928, p. 170, to the effect that a high-placed Mason, having learned in 1911 of the plot to assassinate the Archduke and precipitate a world war, had gone to the head of the Order in Germany in an effort to release forces to frustrate it. But he found himself up against a stone wall.
  4. The American Jewish News for Sept. 19, 1919, contained a personal memoir of one Litman Rosenthal, an “intimate friend” of Max Nordau, a powerful German Jewish financier. The gist of the matter is that Nordau, in his report to a meeting of Jews in Paris in regard to the Sixth Zionist Congress of 1903, which he had just attended, had “prophesied” the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which promised Palestine to the Jews for a national home. Nordau brought his speech to a climax thus:

“Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl [the father of modern Zionism], the Zionist Congress [the First—in 1897], the English Uganda proposition [the British Government, just before this, had offered the Jews a national home in East Africa, and the Sixth Zionist Congress had just rejected it], the future world war, the peace conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created.”

That was in 1903. Douglas Reed, long a highly distinguished special correspondent to various large London newspapers and the author of a number of best-selling books on the fast-shaping situation in Europe prior to the Second World War, in his Somewhere South Of Suez, pronounced the passage quoted “foreknowledge of the highest order” (p. 311). The obvious question is whether it could have been mere prescience, or whether the prophecy must not have depended upon firsthand knowledge both of some secret plan and of a hidden power to bring the plan to fulfillment.

236. And now for the backward glance over the same period. In 1928, in the course of addressing a New York meeting of Zionists, the British Lord Melchett, President of the English Zionist Federation and a public figure of great power, spoke in much the same vein as had Max Nordau in 1903. According to The Jewish Chronicle for November 9, 1928 (p. 19) he said:

“Let me take you back to 1913. If I had stood here in 1913 and said to you, ‘Come to a conference to discuss the reconstruction of a national home in Palestine, you would have looked at me as an idle dreamer; even if I had told you in 1913 that the Austrian Archduke would be killed and that out of all that followed come the chance, the opportunity, the occasion for establishing a national home for Jews in Palestine. Has it ever occurred to you how remarkable it is that out of the welter of world blood there has arisen this opportunity? Do you really believe that this is an accident? Do you really in your hearts believe that we have been led back to Israel by nothing but a fluke? Do you believe there is no greater inner meaning in the opportunity we have been given? After two thousand years of wandering in the wilderness we have a chance and an opportunity bestowed upon us, and many sit back and say it is of no interest to us. I wonder if they have thought of that train of circumstances.”

Before being made Lord Melchett, he was Sir Alfred Mond. He was the First Commissioner for Public Works in the Lloyd George Ministry, and as head of the Mond Chemical Works (afterwards converted into Imperial Chemical Industries), the most powerful chemical industry in England, he dominated the chemical resources of the British Empire. In short, he was in a position of very great public responsibility and power.

 Douglas Reed comments (op. cit., p. 312f.):

“If the words meant, as they appear to mean, that the God in whom Political Zionists believe ordained the murder of an archduke and a welter of blood in order to bring about the National Home, they could with slight alteration be used of the second welter of world blood which brought about the Zionist State. The speaker, had he lived, might in 1948, have asked, with as much or as little truth as in 1928, whether this was nothing but a fluke.”

  1. See Robert L. Owen—The Russian Imperial Conspiracy, 1892-1914, A.&G. Boni, 1927. At the end of May, 1914, Colonel Edward Mandel House, roving diplomat for President Wilson, wrote him from Berlin: “Whenever England consents, France and Russia will close in on Germany and Austria.” Intimate Papers Of Colonel House, Houghton Mifflin, 1926, Vol. I, p. 249.
  2. Vol. II, Sept. 15, 1912, pp. 787-8. Published at 8 Avenue Portalis, Paris. Quoted by Sidney B. Fay, op. cit., Vol. II, pp. 110- 111, footnote 103. Quoted also by de Poncins, op. cit., p. 72.
  3. See Leon de Poncins—Secret Powers Behind Revolution, op. cit., p. 75, where he cites p. 46 of the Pharos shorthand report of the assassins’ trial. The eminent scholar Prof. Revilo P. Oliver, of the University of Illinois, has witnessed to de Poncin’s reliability. See the latter’s Christianity and the Survival of the West, Sterling Enterprises, Sterling, Va., 1973, p. 25.
  4. Sidney B. Fay, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 3.
  5. Ibid., Vol. II, pp. 55-6.
  6. De Poncins, op. cit., pp. 77-80, quoting the Pharos shorthand record of the testimony in the trial of the assassins: “In Freemasonry it is permitted to kill. Ciganovic [one of the conspirators] told me that the Freemasons had condemned to death the Archduke Franz Ferdinand more than a year before.” De Poncins also quotes Count Czernin as having said in his book Im Welt-Kriege [In The World War]: “The Archduke knew quite well that the risk of an attempt on his life was imminent. A year before the war, he informed me that the Freemasons had resolved his death.”

In this connection, it is to be recalled that “at the Masonic congress of Wilhelmsbad . . . it was decided to remove the headquarters of illuminized Freemasonry to Frankfurt, which incidentally was the stronghold of Jewish finance, controlled at this date by such leading members of the race as Rothschild, Oppenheimer, Wertheimer, Schuster, Speyer, Stern and others. At this head lodge of Frankfurt, the gigantic plan of world revolution was carried forward, and it was there that, at a large masonic congress in 1786, two French Freemasons afterwards declared the deaths of Louis XVI [King of France at the time of the Revolution] and Gustavus III of Sweden were definitely decreed.” See Nesta H. Webster—World Revolution, 1921, pp. 19-20 (1971 edition, pp. 32-3).

  1. Sidney B. Fay, op. cit., Vol II, p. 99.
  2. As reported in The Jewish World, January 5, 1922, Henry Ford recalled the impression made upon his mind by the talk of “two very prominent Jews” who were on the “Peace Ship” with him when it was crossing the Atlantic in 1915. “We had not been to sea 200 miles before these Jews began telling me about the power of the Jewish race, how they controlled the world through their control of gold, and that the Jew and no one but the Jew could stop the war.

“I was reluctant to believe this, and said so. So they went into details to tell me the means by which the Jews controlled the war—how they had the money, how they had cornered all the basic materials needed to fight the war, and all that, and they talked so long and so well that they convinced me. They said, and they believed, that the Jews had started the war, that they would continue it so long as they wished, and until the Jew stopped the war it would not be stopped.”

Mr. A.N. Field, after quoting the above in his All These Things (p. 118), went on to record Lt. Colonel Repington’s recollections of a conversation with Count Albert Mensdorff in Austria in 1921. He said:

“Mensdorff thought that Israel had won the war. They had made it, thrived on it, and profited by it. It was their revenge on Christianity.”

As much as it can be understood learning about all written in above mentioned books and references, it cannot be said beyond reasonable doubt that Gavrilo Princip was actually a (crypto) Jew. Further, what can be learned when trying to search for any biography about Gavrilo Princip, the book that devoted most pages about Gavrilo’s ancestry and family (while “confirming” he was of Serbian nationality) was written by Vladimir Dedijer, titled “The Road to Sarajevo“. However, there is a big question of authenticity concerning that particular chapter devoted to Princip in his book, as my suggestion is that Vladimir Dedijer was an agent himself. Mostly under disguise of being a journalist he was sent by a former MSM outlet Politika newspaper to all major war-mongering countries of the era – Poland, Denmark, Norway (1935), England (1935-1936), and Spain (1936). Collaborating with Comunists and later on Partisans. As we can learn at his Wickedpedia entry, he taught at University of Belgrade and was visiting professor of history at Michigan, Harvard, Stanford, Princeton, Yale, Paris (Sorbonne), Manchester and Stockholm Universities.[9] . I’m sure many of you recognize some of the mentioned universities as spook nests, mentioned several times in Mathis’ essays, which again makes Vladimir Dedijer as compromised source to depend on while searching for Gavrilo Princip’s genealogy.

I would like to leave this essay here with many thoughts and leads worth further exploring for all of you, interested in learning something completely different from what is taught in schools. As I am awaiting to lay my hands on few precious books, hoping that they will help me answer the main question about Gavrilo Princip’s ancestors being possibly (crypto) Jewish, one more remark before I conclude here. Here is an entry, translated and quoted from a local Serbian website:

»Gavrilo is a man’s first name derived from Hebrew first name Gabriel, meaning »The Lord is my strength«. It is given after the biblical archangel Gavrilo. It is a name of biblical archangel Gavrilo, the second of seven archangels, who is translating/bringing Lord’s words to mortals. From Judaism this particular archangel converted to Christianity, so his name accordingly spread among Christian nations. This particular first name was among 100 top rated first names in Serbia between years 2003 and 2005. The names derived from it | Gavrilo | are Gavra, Gavrila, Gavrilka, Gavro, Gaga and Gile. The mentioned name | Gavrilo | was as well taken over by Islam and is known there as Gabrail or (locally) Džebrail.«

.


[i]  As we can learn at that link at Wickedpedia: »The St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre (French: Massacre de la Saint-Barthélemy) in 1572 was a targeted group of assassinations and a wave of Catholic mob violence, directed against the Huguenots (French Calvinist Protestants) during the French Wars of Religion. Traditionally believed to have been instigated by Catherine de’ Medici, the mother of King Charles IX, the massacre took place five days after the wedding of the king’s sister Margaret to the Protestant Henry III of Navarre (the future Henry IV of France). This marriage was an occasion for which many of the most wealthy and prominent Huguenots had gathered in largely Catholic Paris.”.

[ii] I found an excerpt from the whole book by William G. Simpson’s »Which Way Western Man?«, with Chapter 19 digitalized, link is  here

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s