Part IV – Lockerbie bombing – what kind of bombing exactly?
I left a few photos for this part IV as candies within this story. As it happened, I was entering Pan Am 103 flight subject totally unprepared for such a deep rabbit hole as it turned to be. I admit, it caught me by surprise with so many things to un-spin, see through, with a task to find some proper imagery to help myself while trying to uncover what might have happened to Clipper Maid (the pictures available on the internet on Lockerbie subject are found only in mediocre quality of low resolution, strangely, so it makes me wonder where are all “normal” resolution pictures stored at, I’m pretty sure we are not allowed to view those in particular). Or at least, I want to have a confirmation of another hoax forced down our throats although with no final answer to how exactly it was perpetrated.
I’d like to begin with another and obvious anomaly, for which we’ll take a look already posted picture and analyze it again, bringing forward yet another detail :
Notice the white house just above at the end of half-tunnel , looking at its roof, it is more or less with all tiles in place (with a small opening in the lower left section of it). It is as well visible on this picture:
The white house’s roof seems in similar shape as it was/is in the first picture, pretty much intact, so I wonder what happened to the roof / tiles here:
It is now partially stripped of tiles, most noticeable in the left lower roof’s corner, with tiles missing on other sections of the roof as well. Such obvious color difference where tiles are missing should be clearly visible in the previous aerial picture, but it can not be noticed as such.
I find it very strange, just what might be the official explanation for it? Roof with all its tiles survives the blast of 91.000 kg of kerosene in near proximity almost intact, but then mysteriously its roof is partially unpatched within hours/days, with tiles missing because of what exactly ? That hurricane-like winds? Suddenly Scotland seems even more dangerous place to live in, first there are airplanes falling from the sky, but if you survive them somehow you might get blown away to the east coast of England, that’s how strong these winds are over there.
Another noticed detail – this particular white house was obviously populated at the time of this event, as the first aerial picture posted shows different shutters’ position than it may be seen in the last two pictures above, which makes me believe it was actually occupied. What a spectacle it has been to observe an exploding fireball behind a meteorite-proof glass from the first row seats! Just priceless.
Then there are a couple of items in that first aerial picture above worth mentioning, four red cars and a mystery man’s figure, found in the middle upper section of the picture, next to a corner of brick wall. Just what is he doing there? Taking a leak? Is it a suggestion ? The story of Manneken Pis is for sure an interesting angle to look at the pissing man in Sherwood Crescent corner – Manneken Pis a famous Brussel’s status, where a legend states that in the 14th century, Brussels was under siege by a foreign power. The city had held its ground for some time, so the attackers conceived of a plan to place explosive charges at the city walls. A little boy named Julianske happened to be spying on them as they were preparing. He urinated on the burning fuse and thus saved the city. As there is no definite answer to whether that mysterious man in the picture is actually urinating, it may be suggesting that Lockerbie was not as lucky as Brussels, brought down by an explosion… I’m wildly speculating here, but it crossed my mind so I was happy to share it here. As for the red cars, Sherwood Cresecent seems to be cummunaly keen on red colored vehicles, intersting enough by itself.
Let’s look at another picture, a nice detail with a close-up picture of the red car that can be seen in the first aerial picture, at the low middle section, in close proximity to the explosion :
Looking at that first aerial picture and focusing on this red car in particular while at it gives me a strange feeling. It looks somehow artificial, with lack of proper details to it regardless of its poor resolution. I wonder whether for photographic purposes, the crash-scene at Lockerbie could have been fabricated as a scale-model ? Whether modelled in whole or just partially. If latter is the case then we might be looking at a scale-model of the wrecked buildings and the half-tunnel in the front, with a couple of red cars around. Pasted on top of a genuine photograph of the intact houses behind / around them? Was that beyond the technical limitations of image (and video?) compositing back in the day (1988)? After all, in the year 1988[i] Photoshop was first publicly introduced and made available so it could mark the beginning of a new era in hoax / fake spectacles[ii].
Although this one did not have that meteorite-proof glass add-on, there should be visible marks of excess heat produced by the explosion of 91.000 kg of kerosene. I can remember seeing devastated cars in similar illogical condition when looking at 9/11 event’s pictures, let me refresh our memories of such:
Cars were damaged / burnt in 9/11 event with no logic or evidence to the source of severe heat/fire their damage suggested, which made me wonder where all heat / fire came from (as nothing around the cars was / is suggesting proximity of extreme heat). To make it reasonable, were such cars brought in to the scenery or was there something we are not supposed to know and question about? It depends at which event we are looking at, I guess.
With Lockerbie car, we have signs of some damage done most probably by mechanical force, however with Lockerbie story I would expect to see this red car completely obliterated due to air blast and fireball following the explosion. So it’s a bit different in both compared cases, but equally illogical and inconsistent to the noticed surrounding damage.
This is an interesting picture with details of one of more damaged houses, a close-up of roof covered with moss. As well, one and only picture of normal resolution:
The roof of the damaged house is heavily covered in moss, it even seems airbrushed green. And yet roofs of other houses, with identical position and similar inclination towards the sun remain moss-free and still slate-grey. Moss is always growing while facing north, but northern parts of other houses’ roofs are seen clear of it so position of the roof is clearly not the reason for it. How can that be?
I’m fairly sure these house damage photos are composite fakes. In the picture above, the roof line is dropping implausibly below the guttering level just underneath the top line of the upstairs windows. At the same time it shows no signs of roof slipping down anywhere else.These are standard-design council houses, built throughout Scotland/UK. Was this picture maybe taken from routine demolitions of identical houses elsewhere and just copy-pasted to suit here?
Now, what I was keeping for the very end was very hard for me to persist withholding from you, is a single sentence found within the Official report, page #31, paragraph #3 when describing a wing section impact and fire, report nonchalantly admits:
»A gas main had also been ruptured during the impact.«
If necessary, re-read it a couple of times. What it suggests is two points a) there was a gas pipeline in proximity, which would perfectly explain the prolonged and half-tunnel like shape of the crater and b) gas was aiding the explosion force of kerosene if it actually occurred. Associating the enormous amount of fuel with the notion of fuel-bomb, we can learn at Wickedpedia about all this as:
»A thermobaric weapon is a type of explosive that utilizes oxygen from the surrounding air to generate an intense, high-temperature explosion, and in practice the blast wave typically produced by such a weapon is of a significantly longer duration than a conventional condensed explosive. The fuel-air bomb is one of the most well-known types of thermobaric weapons.
Most conventional explosives consist of a fuel-oxidizer premix (gunpowder, for example, contains 25% fuel and 75% oxidizer), whereas thermobaric weapons are almost 100% fuel, so thermobaric weapons are significantly more energetic than conventional condensed explosives of equal weight.
A fuel-air explosive (FAE) device consists of a container of fuel and two separate explosive charges. After the munition is dropped or fired, the first explosive charge bursts open the container at a predetermined height and disperses the fuel in a cloud that mixes with atmospheric oxygen (the size of the cloud varies with the size of the munition). The cloud of fuel flows around objects and into structures. The second charge then detonates the cloud, creating a massive blast wave. The blast wave destroys reinforced buildings and equipment and kills and injures people.«
Although in that wing section no charge burst happened and there was no second charge to detonate it neither, the force of impact would be of equal effect as the disperse of a charge blast (maybe even more effective in our case), igniting from the heat of compression effect at the impact at the same time. But such explosion, considering the 91.000 kg of kerosene stored within the wings and enforced effect of such thermobaric mechanism (mix of fuel and air ignited) would tear Sherwood Crescent to pieces not just in relative proximity as pictures of the site suggest, but at large-scale. We should in my opinion see no intact houses, window glass, tiles and cars at least couple 100 meters (if not a couple of 1.000 meters) from the epicenter of such explosion. It’s mostly because of such thesis might have high probability , I would suggest that in Lockerbie bombing there was no kerosene involved , the damage seen in the pictures was produced by exploding the gas from the nearby gas pipeline. Maybe even by using the conventional type of explosives, where only thorough analysis of samples from the site would reveal what actually caused the explosion (that would be particularly interesting analysis to learn the truth about the stories of exploding individual houses coming from alleged witnesses of the event and Lockerbie event in general).
As much as this whole picture analysis is able to show quite some issues worth doubting, questioning and scrutinizing, there is a conclusion to this which makes me so eager to finally get to the part where we’ll look into some of the listed victims, what witnesses said when interviewed and just try to finally answer ourselves – was this for real on any level at all? For what it seems, we may find mostly fictional characters as victims, as much as most of shown up to here seems fictional in many cases.
To be continued…