A remarkable book

It was always my passion to read, I can remember as early as in 1st grade how I sat with my breakfast in front of me, eating and reading. I started with fairy-tales as a junior, of course, but not much has changed since in neither ways. I still have a passion for both stories and books, with a twist to the narrative of the story read.

As much as there is infinite number of books that are out there to consume, there is not enough time to be able to read them all during single lifetime, so if one is determined to read as many as possible, there is an imposed need to filter them and choose amongst them. In my opinion, every intellectual should have a reading order / list developed, at least a short-term one, it’s unforgivable for anybody to ignore all the accumulated knowledge of our ancestors. Then again, it is sometimes extremely hard to filter among the authors and to say who of them is worth gaining our trust. If you follow the work of Miles Mathis, then you surely know how thoroughly constructed is our reality, the powers that be (TPTB) are seemingly editing and orchestrating almost every event worth mentioning, producing the reality as we know it. Considering that we are overwhelmed with selective information released via controlled mainstream media outlets (MSM), it is an absolute necessity to be able to avoid any attempt of manipulation. Just how can I achieve that, you might be asking yourself as much as I am. After all this time and all that I’ve learned so far, I think there’s just no simple answer to it.

I was thinking about this particular problem of information filtering and a slow learning process of filtering them in real-time, trying and understand / learn about the existence of nuclear / atomic energy and weaponry as a driving thought behind it. Around the same time Mathis published his piece on October revolution of 1917 in Russia, where he showed that it was, same as the French revolution of 1789, taken over by crypto-Jews before it even started. Now, before anybody jumps out of his/her skin and accuses me of horrific things, let me clarify my statement on few levels.

First of all, I am not any kind of racist super-ego, nationalist, fascist or anything like it, which would correlate to my impatience toward any religious, national or minority groups. I strongly oppose violence and use of guns and I believe the world would be much nicer place without all mentioned above. I know you can’t be sure about me, but as time passes I will have a chance to convince you otherwise.

As second, there is no Semitism and anti-Semitism involved (note the capital letter for naming it). As Marvin Pope says in review of “The Canaanites” (1964) :

“The term “Semitic,” coined by Schlozer in 1781, should be strictly limited to linguistic matters since this is the only area in which a degree of objectivity is attainable. The Semitic languages comprise a fairly distinct linguistic family, a fact appreciated long before the relationship of the Indo-European languages was recognized. The ethnography and ethnology of the various peoples who spoke or still speak Semitic languages or dialects is a much more mixed and confused matter and one over which we have little scientific control.”

In other words, to be anti-Semite would mean to have a stance against all nations living today in the Middle east region, which is not the case with anybody who might have a stance against the Jewish nation. I do understand the context of anti-Semitism, but all of those who would use this two words, Semitism and anti-Semitism, should be aware it is wrongly used and interpreted and need to consequently make accusations openly, with properly used terminology – anti-Jewish stance is accurate enough to describe any hostile deeds towards Jewish population. Consequently, I could get accused of intolerance against a religious minority or a national minority, maybe I could even stand accused of dissemination of hate speech, but in all cases that is not correct.

I my case and throughout my little blog there is no and there will be no such content authored by me and that is not the essence of my authored text. Anybody suggesting the opposite is kindly asked to produce the evidence of such claims before attacking me. Let’s ask important questions before we pull a trigger, that is not so much to ask of anyone, I’d presume. By proposing a fact such as »crypto-Jews are orchestrating most events«, that can be confirmed by numerous independent and trustworthy sources, by piles of references to genuine existing records/documents and sometimes even direct confessions, none of the accusations mentioned earlier about the so-called anti-Semitism can be applied to it.

Anyway, now that the path to disseminate some facts is relatively clear of obfuscations, I’d finally like to continue where I left before this explanatory intermezzo. As I mentioned earlier, Mathis shared some quite remarkable findings in his piece on Russian revolution of 1917 (as a matter of fact, one of Mathis’ site offers plenty verifiable revelations about the crypto-Jews in position of power), and it was at roughly the same time that I stumbled on Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book »200 Years Together: A History of the Russians and the Jews«.

There is a special story to the book itself and let me introduce it with few paragraphs borrowed from L.T.Kizhe[i], who compiled the translated chapters of Solzhenitsyn’s book into a single document:

»Solzhenitsyn spent roughly ten years toward the end of his life researching and writing a monumental and definitive work entitled 200 Years Together: A History of the Russians and the Jews. Published in the original Russian in 2002, the book was received with a firestorm of rage and denunciation from the literary and media world, from the Jews, and from almost the entire intelligentsia of the established order in the West. Even the Russian government, that had up until then officially revered Solzhenitsyn as the greatest Russian writer and intellectual of the last century, turned its back on him.

From that day to this, the official Russian attitude toward 200 Years Together has been a kind of chagrined mutter: “Well, yes, Solzhenitsyn was a giant in his time, but we all know the old man was getting a bit senile in his old age when he wrote all that anti-Semitic rubbish, eh what?” From being the spiritual father of the new Russia, Solzhenitsyn became the crazy old uncle one had to shut up in his room in the attic lest he embarrass the family in front of guests. Especially Jewish guests.

Ever since its original publication in 2002, immense efforts have been made by the Russian authorities and also by the Western liberal democratic power structure to ignore 200 Years Together, to suppress it as much as possible, and above all to prevent and interdict the book’s translation into foreign languages, most especially into English, which has become essentially the worldwide language of our epoch, as Latin was in the time of the Roman empire and for many centuries afterward. The Russian authorities have to this date refused to allow any official English translation of the book to be published.

There have been fragmentary translations of 200 Years Together into French and German, and a very fragmentary attempt at English translation carried out by a wide and disparate variety of persons unknown. This document you are now reading is based on one such fragmentary and garbled internet file, some sections of which are much better than others, and which has allowed several of the book’s individual chapters to be published separately on the Net on obscure blogs, etc. So far as I am aware—and the book’s history is so confused and shrouded in secrecy, obstruction, and obfuscation that I concede I may be wrong in this—there has been no proper full-length English translation of Solzhenitsyn’s last work published anywhere.

Nor is this document such a work. It does not pretend to be. It is essentially “Solzhenitsyn For Dummies.” This is an attempt to create a readable translation of »200 Years Together: A History of the Russians and the Jews« for a worldwide English-speaking audience which is—let us be brutally frank—largely dumbed-down and functionally illiterate, due to the degeneration and destruction of English-speaking society since the end of the Second World War. This horrific truth is the result of a pervasive Cultural Marxism which is just as poisonous, and which has become in its own way just as tyrannical if (for now) somewhat less overtly murderous, as the Soviet version that Orwell and Solzhenitsyn themselves denounced and resisted.«

Although L.T. Kizhe introduces many subjects worth heavy debating, there is as well plenty of issues where I do not agree with his conclusions. However, that is not the red line I’d like you to follow here with me. In my personal opinion, this book is an extremely rare find and to share a small detail – it was really hard to locate it in this version, as complete as it exists in such non-oficial, partially translated form, so-called samisdat[ii] version.

I was thinking for quite a long time what to point out as highlights of such exceptional book, but I failed to be original. This is the best that would describe the book in short few sentences:

»Solzhenitsyn’s observations add to the growing evidence of the role of Jews as a hostile elite in the USSR-hostile to the native Russian population and willing to engage in the most brutal crimes against them. This translation is very important for bringing this message to the English-speaking world, if only to dispel the common representation of Jews as always and inevitably historical victims.» The truth from this book is just shocking, what we’re dealing here is a book about the largest manslaughter ever taken place. Of course, none of it gets mentioned in history books nor do we learn about it in schools.«

It confirms Mathis thesis on Bolsheviks and Lenin in majority of his claims, just for the taste, a paragraph from page #105 :

»Hundreds of Jews returned from the United States: former emigrants, revolutionaries, and draft escapees – now they all were the revolutionary fighters and victims of Czarism. By order of Kerensky, the Russian embassy in the USA issued Russian passports to anyone who could provide just two witnesses to testify to identity, literally from the street. The situation around Trotsky’s group was peculiar. They were apprehended in Canada on suspicion of connections with Germany. The investigation found that Trotsky travelled not with flimsy Russian papers, but with a solid American passport, inexplicably granted to him despite his short stay in the USA, and with a substantial sum of money, the source of which remained a mystery.«

When I said it confirms Mathis findings in majority, I was shortly discussing it with him, considering that with lack of proper documents and archive access for Mathis, he was guessing on few subjects, i.e. death of Royal family Romanov’s  would more probably turn out to be  very useful to the perpetrators, as Solzhenitsyn says:

»As it turns out, at the beginning of July 1918 Goloshchekin went with the idea to the Kremlin, convinced them of the disadvantages of the “flight of the royal family” option which would cause them simply to disappear, and frankly and directly advocated shooting them and publicly declaring that fact. He came prepared to convince Lenin, but found he did not need to. The only obstacle was that Lenin feared the reaction of the population of Russia and the West. But there were already signs that everything would go smoothly, that the Western powers had quietly written the Romanovs off, and that the murders could proceed without overmuch political risk.

One would think that Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, and Bukharin would have been consulted on such a decision, but not all of them were then in Moscow owing to their many duties, except for Kamenev, and from what we know of these men there is no reason to assume that any of them would have minded. We know that Trotsky reacted indifferently or with approval. In 1935 he wrote in his diary that after he returned to Moscow he casually asked Sverdlov:

 “‘Yes, and where is the king?’

‘It’s over,’ he [Sverdlov] said. ‘Shot.’

‘And his family is where?’

‘The family with him.’

‘Is that all?’ I asked, apparently with a touch of surprise.

‘That’s it!’ said Sverdlov ‘But what?’ He waited for my reaction. I said nothing.

‘Who decided?’ I asked.

‘We decided here.’ I asked no more questions In fact, the decision was not only appropriate, but necessary. The execution of the royal family was needed not simply in order to confuse, terrify, and to deprive the enemy of hope, but also to shake up our own ranks, to show that there was no retreat. Ahead lay complete victory, or else complete destruction.”

Heifetz has analyzed just who could be on this last Leninist Council, in an attempt to determine whose hands were bloody. Of course there was Sverdlov himself, the Polish mass murderer Feliks Dzerzhinsky and Vladimir Petrovsky (Cheka), Stuchka (People’s Commissariat) and W. Schmidt. V. I. Lenin, of course, was the king of the Tribunal.

On July 12, 1918 Goloshchekin returned to Yekaterinburg, waiting for the final order from Moscow, which he presumed would come from Lenin. And Yakov Yurovsky, the watchmaker, the son of a criminal convict at the time exiled to Siberia where he was born, in July 1918 was appointed commandant of the Ipatiev house, where he immediately began planning the operation and organizing the murder technique among Hungarians and Russians, including Pavel Medvedev and Peter Ermakov, and the concealment of the corpses. He laid in the barrels of gasoline and sulfuric acid for the destruction of the carcasses with the help of oblkomissar of supply P. L. Voikov.«

As I was suggesting with it, believing at the time that Romanovs were actually murdered and dissolved in acid, not just masquerading / faking it as Miles suggests with his find. He replied in his final email to me about, scarce with words as it may be his trademark, that it sounds like another layer of misdirection – truths going in, lies coming out. Which consequently shaped my belief about it – it is likely so that Solzhenitsyn did not consider authenticating Lenin’s diary in at least two aspect: for one, it is possible Lenin was scripting / writing a lie in his diary’s entries about Czar’s murder and for two, it is possible that Lenin was not a part of this masquerade / fake murder scenario. As outrageous as it may sound it both cases, the latter would be more likely of the two hypothesis, unless somebody would convince me that anybody would be entering lies into his diary in order to what? Better believe it? Grasp his mind harder so it becomes truth? Or did he lie knowing somebody would sooner or later come to find it, confirming the masquerade / fake murder(s) as truth with it? Maybe this last question touches the essence with it’s proposal, as I should not ignore extremely sinister character type of TPTB when it comes to how thoughtful they play »the game«.

Anyway, the book is full of names of responsible people behind many interesting historical events. You’d be surprised yourself once you’ve read the whole book, it is really amazing how it all came together, for Russian nation rather blue and bloody. With their national flag horrifyingly embodying it.

PS: A very comprehensive documentary on Russian 1917 revolution and beyond :

»In the Shadow of Hermes« by Jüri Lina (2011), based on the book “Under the Sign of the Scorpion” by the Estonian dissident Jüri Lina who narrates this documentary in Swedish.

LINK :

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, 200 Years Together: A History of the Russians and the Jews

[i] L.T.Kizhe, the author of the document compiled from existing translations of single chapters of Solzhenitsyn’s book, is offering his opinion in the foreword to this document, where one can learn a few thing about Kizhe’s – in the first paragraph of this foreword, he implies the greatness of Solzhenitsyn as well as George Orwell, suggesting almost equal greatness of them both. I certainly do not agree and would encourage readers to visit this link to Mathis’ piece on Noam Chomsky, disclosing many authors of the New Age, George Orwell alias Eric Blair included, as spooks.

[ii] The process of disseminating documentation via underground channels, attached mostly to dissidents of CCCP (ex Russian socialistic federation. Direct translation of the word in Slavic language would be : published by himself / herself, with no gender relation to the word in the original language.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s